Will appear on Seller pages – RECENT SELLER ARTICLES

Exit Strategies helps ProtoFab Expand its Prototyping Capabilities in the Northern California Machining Services Market

Exit Strategies recently advised on the merger of two closely-held Northern California precision machining companies.

Founded in 1996 by Grant Kerr, GMAN Precision LLC is a full-service precision machine shop specializing in complex machined parts and services for R&D, prototyping, and preliminary production work. Its markets include aerospace & defense, biotech, electronics, energy, food processing equipment, medical device, and others. ProtoFab, Inc., based in Petaluma, California, is an ISO9001:2008 certified Northern California manufacturer of precision-machined components for low and high volume production. Major industries served by Protofab are medical, automotive, commercial and test and measurement.

Acquired by

Operationally, adding G-Man’s superb R&D prototyping expertise to Protofab’s world-class production capabilities will deliver even greater value to customers.  The move will give customers single-point machining services for the entire life cycle of their products; from initial R&D, through product launch, production and end-of-life. Culturally the companies share a strong commitment to quality and continuous improvement, and to their clients’ success. This is a smart combination that, combined with disciplined execution of a well thought out integration plan, will accelerate the combined entity’s growth in the Northern California market. Exit Strategies is pleased to have advised on this strategic merger. Terms of the deal will not be disclosed.

This transaction is another example of Exit Strategies’ M&A experience in the California manufacturing sector. We have appraised, sold and merged numerous contract manufacturers representing a broad swath of manufacturing disciplines and vertical markets. If you own a food, wood products, electronics, machining, fabrication, molding, finishing, or manufacturing services business of any kind, and you are looking to sell, merge or acquire a company, we are interested in hearing from you.

Contact ESGI’s president Al Statz at 707-781-8580 or alstatz@exitstrategiesgroup.com.

Do investment bankers, M&A advisors and business brokers actually add value? If so, how?

Financially savvy company owners, such as private equity groups and diversified public companies, clearly see the value that M&A advisors add, since virtually all of them hire one to run a professional sale process when selling a company in their portfolio — even when they know who the buyers are and which one is likely will pay the highest price.

On the other hand, most entrepreneurs only sell their company once. As a first time seller, they haven’t experienced the value that a capable M&A advisor adds, which puts them at a disadvantage. Fortunately a survey of business sellers by Fairfield University professor Dr. Michael McDonald¹ provides credible evidence that intermediaries add value and explains how. I’ve summarized some of the survey’s findings here.

Professor McDonald surveyed 85 business owners located across the U.S. who sold their companies with the help of investment bankers² for between $10 million and $250 million during the 2011 to 2016 period.

All 85 sellers answered YES to the question of whether their investment banker added value.  As to where they added value, McDonald asked the owners to rate the value and relative importance of 8 services that such intermediaries provide:

  1. Identifying and finding the buyer
  2. Managing the M&A process and strategy
  3. Adding credibility to the seller
  4. Enabling management to focus on running the company during the sale process
  5. Educating and coaching the owners
  6. Negotiating the transaction
  7. Preparing the company for sale
  8. Structuring the transaction

All eight of these services added value according to the owners surveyed.  They said the most valuable services were, “managing the M&A process & strategy”, “structuring the transaction”, and “educating and coaching the owner”.

Importantly, the least valuable service was “identifying and finding the buyer”.  Simply introducing a buyer to a seller is not the primary value that intermediaries bring to the table (though clearly that is still a valuable part of the M&A process).

While this survey focused on $10-250 million deals, its findings hold true for smaller companies as well. If anything, the value that an experienced intermediary brings to owners of smaller businesses is even greater. These owners usually have even fewer internal resources to draw upon and are even more consumed with running their companies than their middle-market counterparts. Partnering with a quality business broker makes even more sense.

¹ I’m using the terms investment banker, M&A advisor, business broker, deal maker and transaction intermediary more or less interchangeably here. Firms that handle only $25 million plus deals usually refer to themselves as investment banks. Firms that mostly sell main street businesses for under $2 million usually call themselves business brokers.  Exit Strategies mostly operates in the $2-50 million price range, and we’ve settled on calling ourselves M&A advisors. Some firms like ours prefer the term “boutique investment bank”, particularly if they serve a few niche industries. When hiring an intermediary, regardless of what they call themselves, it is important to have a good understanding of their knowledge and experience, and the level of service they provide.

² Download the full survey results: The_Value_of_Middle_Market_Investment_Bankers


For more information on Exit Strategies’ full-service sell-side M&A services or to discuss a current need, confidentially, you can reach Al Statz in our Sonoma County California office at 707-781-8580 or alstatz@exitstrategiesgroup.com.

Increase Business Value with Recurring Revenue

Businesses with a higher percentage of recurring revenue generally sell for higher prices. Recurring revenue business models are highly sought after by strategic and private equity buyers because they are perceived as less risky. Future revenue is more predictable and requires less ongoing sales effort and reinvestment.

Companies like Salesforce.com pioneered recurring revenue in the software world, creating the Software as a Service (or SaaS) model. SaaS turned the traditional software licensing model on its head. Not surprisingly, acquirers of software companies reward sellers who’ve built a low-risk subscription model that looks to them like an annuity stream.

Companies in all industries can increase value with a recurring revenue model. Property management companies sell for more than real estate brokerages, for example, because they have long-term management agreements with landlords and leases with tenants that produce steady monthly revenue. Staffing companies, which place temporary workers with employers and produce annuity-like monthly revenue, sell for more than project based recruiting firms. Distributors who sell primarily proprietary products to OEMs sell for higher multiples than distributors who primarily sell commodities to end-users because high switching costs make customer relationships last much longer.

What percentage of your company’s revenue is recurring? 

Almost any business can find at least one recurring revenue opportunity. A license-based software company for example can add an annual support  program. Almost every boutique wineries has a wine club that automatically ships wines to customers on a monthly or quarterly basis. Restaurants can create loyalty programs that encourage customers to return on a regular basis.

Whether you are planning to exit soon or years from now, we encourage you to consider the immediate cash flow and future valuation benefit of recurring revenue.

Contact us for more information on increasing the predictability of your business revenue to increase enterprise value.

Early-Stage Tech Company Exits

You’ve built a world-class software solution, delivered to customers as a SaaS application or web service.  You’ve recruited a team and created intellectual property. Customer retention is strong and the buzz is growing in your vertical market. Each new customer acquisition represents incremental recurring revenue that falls directly to your bottom line – and the company is closing in on cash flow positive territory.

Could this be the right time to sell the company?

You may be thinking, I’ve barely scratched the surface of the company’s income potential. Why sell at this juncture? The key is that you’ve built the engine for future financial returns. Perhaps a strategic acquirer with more marketing muscle or an existing customer base can turbo charge sales and edge out the competition better than you can on your own.  Or perhaps you’re a serial entrepreneur who’s strength is starting companies, and you’re ready for a new challenge. There could be any number of reasons why selling at this stage makes sense.

When implementing an exit strategy, early stage companies must select the right strategic M&A partner. Start-ups that are short on track record and long on vision and promise represent a unique species in the M&A market. Investment banking firms typically charge hefty fees, and prefer working with larger, later-stage clients.  On the other end of the spectrum, business brokers are generally unaccustomed to working with IP-focused technology clients.  If you’re caught in this under-served market niche, Exit Strategies Group can help. We focus on lower middle market clients, and have the skills and experience to value, package, market, and sell early-stage companies successfully.

One of your first questions will likely be, “what’s my tech start-up worth?”

Factors Affecting Small Tech Company Valuation

  1. Annual revenues and revenue growth rate
  2. How revenues are obtained (licensing fees vs subscription)
  3. Profitability
  4. Customer retention
  5. Strength of management team, and post-acquisition longevity
  6. Growth of the underlying industry
  7. Intellectual property
  8. Technology leadership
  9. Market share
  10. Viral adoption

In 2016, there were several noteworthy deals in the public markets.  While these public company transactions do not reflect how an early-stage privately-held tech company will be valued, it’s interesting to note the relative multiples of these deals:

Seller Buyer Revenues Transaction Rev. Multiple
LinkedIn Microsoft $2B $26.2B 13.1
Demandware Salesforce $2.37M $2.8B 11.8
NetSuite Oracle $7.41M $9.3B 12.6
Yahoo! Verizon $4.96B $5B 1.0

Is it surprising that Yahoo! sold at a 1x revenue multiple while the others sold for at least 11x?  LinkedIn, Demandware, and NetSuite all have growing revenues, defensible IP, in growing market segments. Yahoo! does not.

saasevtorev

Source: Software Equity Group | 2015 Annual Software Industry Financial Report

On average, larger companies (in terms of annual revenue) command higher price/revenue multiples. Price/revenue multiples for small early-stage companies typically range from 1X to 3X (with outliers as low as 0.5X or as high as 10X).

When planning your exit, it’s beneficial to understand the broad range of valuation multiples and influencing factors. The underlying value drivers hold true for all size deals. Consider the valuation factors listed above, and make sure your company is firing on all cylinders.

If you have a $1-50 million revenue early stage software or tech business and you’re planning or considering an exit, please contact one of Exit Strategies’ California-based advisors for a free confidential consultation.

Don’t Forget the Net Investment Income Tax when Selling a Business

The Net Investment Income Tax, which our friends at the IRS put into effect in 2013, takes an extra toll on business owners who sell their businesses; and for that matter, on most higher income taxpayers and any moderate income taxpayer whose income increases suddenly in a given tax year.

What is the Net Investment Income Tax?

The Net Investment Income Tax (“NIIT”) is a 3.8 percent federal tax on certain income of individuals, estates and trusts whose modified adjusted gross income or “MAGI” exceeds certain threshold amounts. Common forms of investment income are interest, dividends, capital gains and passive business activities such as rental income or income derived from royalties. Generally, wages and income from an operating business are NOT considered net investment income.

For individuals, the MAGI threshold is $250,000 (married filing jointly) and $200,000 for single filers. Taxpayers with MAGI over the threshold are taxed at a flat rate of 3.8 percent on all net investment income, in addition to other taxes!

When you sell a business of any significant value, NIIT will likely affect your tax liability in the tax year(s) in which you receive payment. Individuals report (and pay) net investment income tax on IRS Form 1040; while estates and trusts use Form 1041.

So, what should business owners do?

If you are considering the sale of a business or business interest, it is important that you fully understand the tax implications of a sale beforehand. There are strategies that you can use to minimize your tax liability if you take action early enough and/or structure the sale in certain ways. Contact your tax advisor to estimate your tax liability and find out what can be done to maximize your after-tax proceeds.

 

Exit Strategies are not tax professionals, and we do not provide tax advice. However, tax issues arise in nearly all of our exit planning, valuation and M&A brokerage engagements, so we are well aware of them. If you are looking for an experienced CPA or tax advisor to analyze the various federal and state tax issues related to a business transaction and recommend appropriate tax minimization strategies, we can recommend one or two. Feel free to Email Al Statz or call him at 707-781-8580 for help.

Selling an Ecommerce Business in the Lower Middle Market

With continuing growth in consumer online spending and many high-profile public acquisitions this year, it seems like a great time to sell your online retail business. But things are never quite as simple as they appear.

Over the past few months, several impressive acquisitions have been announced in the public markets. Walmart has purchased Jet.com at a jaw dropping $3.3 billion; a move that is presumably Walmart’s effort to narrow Amazon’s ever-increasing dominance. Consumer brands company, Unilever, acquired Dollar Shave Club earlier this year, another massive $1 billion deal. And the Unilever acquisition machine is still hungry, rumored to be purchasing Jessica Alba’s The Honest Company, also for $1 billion.

Other well-known emerging ecommerce companies have raised impressive sums of money, suggesting incredible valuations. Take Ipsy for example, which raised $100 million in 2015 for their subscription-based make up service.

The above examples all have one or more of the following characteristics in common: Strong intellectual property, unique business model, extreme differentiation, and larger than life CEOs.

Most online stores do not have a Hollywood-famous CEO or an R&D budget to reinvent the consumer shopping experience. How do these companies create acquisition value? In the lower middle market, we often explore exit strategies with CEOs of ecommerce companies; in the process, we’ve discovered two differing models that are both attractive to prospective buyers in their own unique ways.

On one hand, there are many niche-oriented “efficient online stores” – where a majority of sales are generated through channels, and where most products are drop-shipped directly to customers. These companies have narrow, unique product lines – simple enough to manage with a basic ecommerce platform. Such an ecommerce business requires few employees, little or no office space, and virtually no inventory. An online business with these characteristics, and $1 – $2 million in revenues, can be attractive to individual and financial buyers.

On the other hand, many “mature ecommerce businesses” reached an inflection point – where it became mandatory to invest heavily in underlying platforms and technologies, to make difficult decisions about sales channels (and related margins), and to bear the overhead of specialized marketing staff and warehousing. When revenues exceed $5 million with consistent growth and profitability, such online retailers can become attractive to strategic buyers.

Online businesses have become far more competitive and challenging in today’s business landscape. Large players like Amazon increasingly sell virtually every product category, breaking through the old fortress walls of niche-based differentiation. Large players are investing billions in technologies – such as Chatbots and drone delivery – simultaneously creating simplicity for consumers and barriers to entry for smaller online retailers.

It’s always important to consider your exit strategy, while focusing on growth and fundamentals. Are you building an efficient online store or a mature ecommerce business? These strategic decisions prepare your company for eventual exit, and create appeal for the right kind of buyer when the time comes.

Recent Trends in the M&A Market

Pepperdine University, of Malibu, California, in conjunction with the International Business Brokers Association and M&A Source, publishes a quarterly Market Pulse Survey of business brokers that provides useful information concerning the market for Main Street ($0-$2M sales price) and lower middle market ($2-$50M sales price) businesses.

Highlights from their most recent report for Q1 2016, include:

  • 50% of all business sell
  • Retirement is still the prime motivating factor for sellers followed by burnout.
  • The strongest growth for new sellers is in the $2M-$5M segment
  • Although the magnitude had declined somewhat, the lower middle market it is still a Sellers’ market.
  • Main Street multiples of SDE have remained relatively stable between 2 and 3x over the past 7 quarters
  • Multiples of EBITDA in the lower middle market have also remained fairly stable at 4x for $2M-$5M sales, but have risen for the $5M-$50 sales to 5.5x in the current quarter.
  • The average Main Street business sold for about 92% of asking price, while lower middle market companies sold for around 94% of the advisors’ and sellers’ expected price.
  • First-time buyers accounted for 43% of <$500K transactions while Private Equity Groups comprise 43% of buyers of $5M-50M businesses
  • It takes an average of 9 months to close a lower middle market deal.

To view the latest Market Pulse report or to discuss a current need in the area of business sales and acquisitions, please contact Jim Leonhard, CVA MBA at 916-800-2716 or jhleonhard@exitstrategiesgroup.com. 

Using Retention Bonuses to Enable an M&A Transaction

Assurance of business continuity is essential to most business acquisitions, and for small to mid-size companies, this often translates to retaining key employees. This blog looks at using a simple tool, called a stay bonus or retention bonus, to keep your key people on board through a sale or merger of your company.

Bonuses are commonly used in business to reward employees for performance, such as hitting a sales target, implementing a new system, or boosting manufacturing productivity. Bonuses can also be used to incentivize a key employee to stay with your company for a specified period of time after a sale or merger.

How much are we talking about here?

sbimageStay bonus amounts are customarily based on the key person’s annual compensation, determined in accordance with the risk and effect of losing them. According to Mercer’s Survey of M&A Retention and Transaction Programs, median stay bonuses paid by U.S. companies range from 25 to 95 percent of base salary depending on the position (see graphic). The way we see this at Exit Strategies is that the stay bonus amount has to be personally meaningful to the key employee. In many of our deals this number is half to two-thirds of a person’s annual compensation.

But isn’t retention a buyer’s concern?

Remember that what gives your business value is the expectation of future earnings, adjusted for risk. As you reduce risk for buyers, your business value and probable selling price go up. From a buyer perspective, the cost of acquiring a business is more than just the purchase price. Other line items on their investment ledger include, for example, legal and professional transaction fees, loan fees and other closing costs, working capital injection (if you retain cash or AR) and any extra compensation paid to employees to ensure their continued employment and performance.

Stay bonuses can come from either side of the table—the seller or the company acquiring—or both. When retention bonuses are paid out of your proceeds, buyers can afford to pay a higher purchase price. So, in the end, it really doesn’t matter which side the bonus comes from.

When is the bonus offered?

Stay bonus agreements (a.k.a. stay-put agreements) are usually offered to (negotiated with) key employees when the owner is preparing to sell the company. Actual timing normally varies by employee and circumstances. Someone who you don’t identify as key to your company’s future may be offered a financial incentive during due diligence to ensure their participation in the short-term post-sale integration process. Integration bonuses are typically offered to CFOs, controllers or IT specialists.

Offering a stay bonus early on arises when an employee is critical to future performance and would be difficult to replace (e.g. a top design engineer or salesperson). Or when you need to involve them in the selling process. It may be compensation for the extra work involved. A third situation is when the employee is aware that you plan to sell the company, and you need them to stay put. When employees become aware that their employer is for sale, they understandably get nervous and may begin seeking alternative employment or become more open to offers of employment. When competitors find out that a company is for sale, key employees are likely to be approached and offered signing bonuses to jump ship. You can mitigate that risk by putting a retention bonus in place early on.

When is a stay bonus paid?

Stay bonuses should be paid out a specified number of months AFTER your deal has closed, not before and not at closing. Remember, you need them to stay on with the new owner. Most retention incentive bonuses are payable within 3 to 12 months after a deal closes. For key-employees who are critical to long-term success, it may be 24 to 36 months. Stay bonus agreements can also have an acceleration provision where they become payable if employment is terminated by the buyer.

How much should I budget for this?

The budget for stay bonuses will depend on several facts and circumstances. It’s a wide range in practice, and in many cases its zero. As a general rule, the larger the company, the smaller this budget is relative to the sale price. Unfortunately for small service businesses with few employees, it can be a significant percentage of the sale price. Some sellers elect to pay bonuses to loyal employees simply to acknowledge their contribution to the company’s goodwill value—unrelated to retention.

Stay Bonus Limitations

Clearly stay bonuses have limitations as a long term retention tool. Ultimately the buyer will need to provide rewarding work, a desirable culture, competitive compensation, growth opportunities and strong leadership. They do however enable transactions by reducing business risk during the critical months before and after an acquisition or merger. And of course there are other forms of financial incentives that can be used to align the interests of owners and employees, such as stock options, stock appreciation rights and phantom stock —a subject for another day.

In closing; retaining key staff affects the overall success of most M&A deals. Key employees drive customer retention, product and service quality levels, and in some cases business survival. Bonusing key employees to facilitate a business sale, merger or acquisition isn’t always necessary, but should always be considered when developing your exit strategy.

California-based Exit Strategies Groiup has been helping company owners plan for and exit their businesses successfully since 2002. Stay bonuses are just one tool in the M&A toolkit. If you have questions or are considering selling your company, Email Al Statz or call him at 707-781-8580 for a confidential consultation.

Can You Sell a Contracting Business to a Buyer Without a License?

Solar Installers, General Contractors, Electricians and Plumbers in California have something in common when it comes to selling their businesses. All of these businesses require a Contractors State Licensing Board (CSLB) license to operate. This can be an additional burden to the process of transitioning a business to a new owner. What if a potential buyer doesn’t have the necessary licenses? The easiest solution to this issue is to target investors that already have the Licenses needed to operate the business but this obviously limits the pool of potential buyers.

It is possible to sell a contracting business to an individual without a CSLB license but it requires some negotiation, trust and planning between the seller and buyer. To maintain their Contractor’s License a contracting business must employ or associate with a “Qualifying Individual” or “Qualifier”. A Qualifier has demonstrated knowledge and experience in the construction industry and can either be a Responsible Managing Officer (RMO) or a Responsible Managing Employee (RME) of the company.

An RMO/RME is according to California Law permanently employed by the applicant and is actively engaged in the operation of the applicant’s contracting business for at least 32 hours or 80 percent of the total hours per week such business is in operation, whichever is less. An RMO and RME may have different duties within the company but their responsibilities and liabilities with respect to the license are the same.

A contracting business can be sold to a buyer without a contractor’s license as long as the Qualifying Individual for the company is willing to continue to be employed by the business until the buyer is able to obtain the necessary licenses or hire a new Qualifying Individual. Under this approach managerial control will inherently be divided as the Seller’s Qualifying Individual will want to maintain close oversight of the contracting work being performed. Typically these situations are transitional because the new business owner will want to obtain the necessary licenses themselves or hire their own Qualifying Individual.

Exit Strategies Group has sold many California contracting businesses; some to investors who did not have the necessary CSLB licenses prior to the sale/acquisition transaction. With legal consultation, careful planning and development of trust between parties we help our clients to navigate this obstacle and successfully exit their contracting businesses.

Please contact Adam Wiskind at (707) 781-8744 or awiskind@exitstrategiesgroup.com about selling a Solar Installation Company, Construction Company or any other company requiring a California Contractor’s License.

Add-On Acquisitions are on the Rise

When developing an exit strategy for your company, we will consider whether Private Equity Groups (PEG’s) would want to acquire it as either a new platform company or as an add-on (also “bolt-on”) to one of their existing portfolio companies. Most small companies are too small or don’t have strong enough management teams to be attractive platform opportunities, however many are strong add-on candidates. According to PitchBook, which tracks the PEG M&A activity in the middle market, the number of add-ons as a percentage of all acquisitions grew from 43% in 2006 to over 60% in 2015 — and Q1 data showed a continuing increase to 68%.

buyoutactivityWhat has caused this trend? A number of reasons are generally cited, including:

  • Larger companies typically trade at higher valuation multiples, and this gap has risen in recent years
  • It has become increasingly harder to find good platform companies making add-ons more appealing
  • Add-ons are easier to assimilate because the PEG already knows and understands the industry
  • The increasingly shorter holding periods for platform companies makes a buy and build with add-ons a favored strategy
  • An add-on can increase a platform company’s competitive position in its industry by providing synergies or access to a new niche market
  • PEG’s can often use more debt to buy an add-on and invest less equity

As a potential seller of an add-on company, you might consider these questions, among others:

  • How does your company align with and how could it be integrated into a platform company?
  • In addition to a good strategic fit, PEG’s look for strong profit margins, a defensible market niche and revenue “stickiness”. Does your business have these qualities?
  • Business continuity will be important to the buyer. Will you consider providing ongoing leadership and retaining some equity for a future sale at a potentially higher price per share?
  • PEG due diligence can be exhaustive, as they are experienced and disciplined investors and typically require multiple approvals from lenders and investors. How will your company fare in such a deal environment?

If you are interested in understanding PEG investing activity in your industry and whether your company is a strong add-on or platform acquisition candidate, contact Jim Leonhard, CVA MBA at 916-800-2716 or jhleonhard@exitstrategiesgroup.com.